<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing a Development Stack for Installable Web Applications: Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nobugleftbehind.com/choosing-a-development-stack-for-installable-web-applications-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nobugleftbehind.com/choosing-a-development-stack-for-installable-web-applications-part-i/</link>
	<description>Software quality, testing and programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gurock</title>
		<link>http://nobugleftbehind.com/choosing-a-development-stack-for-installable-web-applications-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gurock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nobugleftbehind.com/?p=228#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Rob,

I have thought about the reasons myself when I posted my comment, and I think it boils down to the fact tht I actually know no one who is building a full product with Perl myself. For most other web technologies, be it ASP.NET, Rails, PHP, Python, Java .. I know multiple people who successfully use it, and this makes it a lot easier to go with such technologies. I know it&#039;s probably rubbish and I&#039;m sure that there&#039;s nothing wrong with Perl from a technology standpoint (at least I&#039;m sure it&#039;s superior to PHP, which has quite a few technical problems, although it&#039;s extremely easy to deploy). And I also used Perl in the past (not for web stuff though), but for me, even if it&#039;s probably not really justified, Perl sounds like a legacy technology that I probably wouldn&#039;t choose to build a new product.

Regards,
Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>I have thought about the reasons myself when I posted my comment, and I think it boils down to the fact tht I actually know no one who is building a full product with Perl myself. For most other web technologies, be it ASP.NET, Rails, PHP, Python, Java .. I know multiple people who successfully use it, and this makes it a lot easier to go with such technologies. I know it&#8217;s probably rubbish and I&#8217;m sure that there&#8217;s nothing wrong with Perl from a technology standpoint (at least I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s superior to PHP, which has quite a few technical problems, although it&#8217;s extremely easy to deploy). And I also used Perl in the past (not for web stuff though), but for me, even if it&#8217;s probably not really justified, Perl sounds like a legacy technology that I probably wouldn&#8217;t choose to build a new product.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kinyon</title>
		<link>http://nobugleftbehind.com/choosing-a-development-stack-for-installable-web-applications-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kinyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nobugleftbehind.com/?p=228#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Dennis -

    I&#039;m curious - Why not use Perl for developing an entire product? We hear that a lot from non-Perlers and it seems to be a very odd statement to make. What exactly is it about Perl that turns you off?

Thanks,
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis -</p>
<p>    I&#8217;m curious &#8211; Why not use Perl for developing an entire product? We hear that a lot from non-Perlers and it seems to be a very odd statement to make. What exactly is it about Perl that turns you off?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gurock</title>
		<link>http://nobugleftbehind.com/choosing-a-development-stack-for-installable-web-applications-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gurock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nobugleftbehind.com/?p=228#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Hey Rob,

we haven&#039;t considered Catalyst when we looked at available frameworks. I will make sure to consider it for a future project, as it looks quite nice. I&#039;m not so sure if I really want to use Perl for developing an entire product though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob,</p>
<p>we haven&#8217;t considered Catalyst when we looked at available frameworks. I will make sure to consider it for a future project, as it looks quite nice. I&#8217;m not so sure if I really want to use Perl for developing an entire product though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kinyon</title>
		<link>http://nobugleftbehind.com/choosing-a-development-stack-for-installable-web-applications-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kinyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nobugleftbehind.com/?p=228#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Have you considered Catalyst (MVC) + DBIx::Class (ORM) + Moose (OO)? This is a Perl stack with a huge community of developers behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered Catalyst (MVC) + DBIx::Class (ORM) + Moose (OO)? This is a Perl stack with a huge community of developers behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
